Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 30 N. J. 273, 152 A. 2d 569.
Hayden C. Covington for appellant.
Gerald E. Monoghan for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
DUNITZ ET AL. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 581.
Decided February 23, 1960.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: See 170 Cal. App. 2d 399, 338 P.2d 1001.
John W. Holmes for appellants.
Roger Arnebergh and Bourke Jones for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [361 U.S. 536, 537]
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 361 U.S. 536
No. 579
Decided: February 23, 1960
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)