NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY 361 U.S. 534 (1960)

United States Supreme Court

NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY (1960)

No. 563

Decided: February 23, 1960

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 390, 160 N. E. 2d 647.

Gilbert S. Rosenthal for appellant.

Eliot H. Lumbard and Nathan Skolnik for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/361/534#">361 U.S. 534 </flCite> (1960) 361 U.S. 534 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)

361 U.S. 534

NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 564.
Decided February 23, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 220 Md. 418, 153 A. 2d 287.

Herbert M. Brune for appellant.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and John Martin Jones, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [361 U.S. 534, 535]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law