STUART v. WILSON 361 U.S. 232 (1960)

United States Supreme Court

STUART v. WILSON (1960)

No. 495

Decided: January 11, 1960

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and John Wildenthal, Jr. and Tom I. McFarling, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

LEWIS v. MOORE, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/361/232#">361 U.S. 232 </flCite> (1960) 361 U.S. 232 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LEWIS v. MOORE, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)

361 U.S. 232

LEWIS v. MOORE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 540.
Decided January 11, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 250 N.C. 77, 108 S. E. 2d 26.

Herman L. Taylor and Samuel S. Mitchell for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [361 U.S. 232, 233]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network