STUART v. WILSON 361 U.S. 232 (1960)

United States Supreme Court

STUART v. WILSON (1960)

No. 495

Decided: January 11, 1960

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and John Wildenthal, Jr. and Tom I. McFarling, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

LEWIS v. MOORE, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/361/232#">361 U.S. 232 </flCite> (1960) 361 U.S. 232 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LEWIS v. MOORE, 361 U.S. 232 (1960)

361 U.S. 232

LEWIS v. MOORE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 540.
Decided January 11, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 250 N.C. 77, 108 S. E. 2d 26.

Herman L. Taylor and Samuel S. Mitchell for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [361 U.S. 232, 233]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law