Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 436, Wool v. United States, and No. 437, Rubin v. United States, also on certiorari to the same Court.
Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Reported below: 258 F.2d 9.
Anthony Bradley Eben argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 435.
Albert H. Treiman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 436.
John T. Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner in No. 437. On the brief was Isidor Enselman.
Oscar H. Davis argued the causes for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg, Julia P. Cooper and Jerome M. Feit.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. [360 U.S. 470, 471]
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Citation: 360 U.S. 470
No. 435
Decided: June 22, 1959
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)