Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 436, Wool v. United States, and No. 437, Rubin v. United States, also on certiorari to the same Court.
Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Reported below: 258 F.2d 9.
Anthony Bradley Eben argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 435.
Albert H. Treiman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 436.
John T. Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner in No. 437. On the brief was Isidor Enselman.
Oscar H. Davis argued the causes for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg, Julia P. Cooper and Jerome M. Feit.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. [360 U.S. 470, 471]
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 360 U.S. 470
No. 435
Decided: June 22, 1959
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)