SIEGEL v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY, NEW YORK 359 U.S. 552 (1959)

United States Supreme Court

SIEGEL v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY, NEW YORK (1959)

No. 773

Decided: June 01, 1959

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 5 N. Y. 2d 707, 708.

William G. Mulligan for appellants.

Frank H. Gordon for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

OHIO v. DAYTON POWER & LIGHT CO., <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/359/552#">359 U.S. 552 </flCite> (1959) 359 U.S. 552 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

OHIO v. DAYTON POWER & LIGHT CO., 359 U.S. 552 (1959)

359 U.S. 552

OHIO EX REL. KLAPP, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, v. DAYTON POWER & LIGHT CO.
ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 851.
Decided June 1, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 263 F.2d 909.

Robert Houston French, Haveth E. Mau and R. K. Wilson for petitioner.

Julian de Bruyn Kops for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed. Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 3 Cranch 267; Removal Cases, 100 U.S. 457 ; Indianapolis v. Chase National Bank, 314 U.S. 63 .

[359 U.S. 552, 1]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network