SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, 359 U.S. 532 (1959)

United States Supreme Court

SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA(1959)

No. 763

Decided: May 25, 1959

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 84 Ariz. 365, 329 P.2d 883.

George L. Buland, Burton Mason and Randolph Karr for appellant.

Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Wm. S. Andrews, Assistant Attorney General, and Stanley W. Trachta for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

RODGERS v. UTAH, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/359/532#">359 U.S. 532 </flCite> (1959) 359 U.S. 532 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

RODGERS v. UTAH, 359 U.S. 532 (1959)

359 U.S. 532
RODGERS v. UTAH.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH.
No. 695, Misc.
Decided May 25, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 8 Utah 2d 156, 329 P.2d 1075.

Lewis J. Wallace for appellant.

E. R. Callister, Attorney General of Utah, and Raymond W. Gee, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [359 U.S. 532, 533]

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law