SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA 359 U.S. 532 (1959)

United States Supreme Court

SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA (1959)

No. 763

Decided: May 25, 1959

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 84 Ariz. 365, 329 P.2d 883.

George L. Buland, Burton Mason and Randolph Karr for appellant.

Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Wm. S. Andrews, Assistant Attorney General, and Stanley W. Trachta for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

RODGERS v. UTAH, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/359/532#">359 U.S. 532 </flCite> (1959) 359 U.S. 532 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

RODGERS v. UTAH, 359 U.S. 532 (1959)

359 U.S. 532

RODGERS v. UTAH.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH.
No. 695, Misc.
Decided May 25, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 8 Utah 2d 156, 329 P.2d 1075.

Lewis J. Wallace for appellant.

E. R. Callister, Attorney General of Utah, and Raymond W. Gee, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [359 U.S. 532, 533]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network