GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA 358 U.S. 47 (1958)

United States Supreme Court

GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA (1958)

No. 166

Decided: October 13, 1958

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 184 Pa. Super. 522, 136 A. 2d 145.

John W. Keller and Mitchell Salem Fisher for appellant.

Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Frank P. Lawley, Jr. and Harry J. Rubin, Deputy Attorneys General, and George C. Eppinger for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/358/47#">358 U.S. 47 </flCite> (1958) 358 U.S. 47 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 358 U.S. 47 (1958)

358 U.S. 47

MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 144, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 167 Ohio St. 323, 148 N. E. 2d 229.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [358 U.S. 47, 48]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network