Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 4 N. Y. 2d 423, 151 N. E. 2d 845.
Russell D. Morrill and Francis L. Casey for appellant.
Stanley Buchsbaum and Morris L. Heath for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 283, Misc.
Decided January 12, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 492, 321 P.2d 497.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [358 U.S. 282, 283]
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 358 U.S. 282
No. 526
Decided: January 12, 1959
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)