Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Judgment affirmed upon the limited grounds on which the District Court rested its decision.
Reported below: 162 F. Supp. 372.
James M. Nabrit, Jr., for appellants.
Ormond Somerville, Reid B. Barnes and Jos. F. Johnston for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed upon the limited grounds on which the District Court rested its decision. 162 F. Supp. 372, 384. [358 U.S. 101, 102]
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Citation: 358 U.S. 101
No. 341
Decided: November 24, 1958
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)