BABCOCK v. CALIFORNIA 356 U.S. 581 (1958)

United States Supreme Court

BABCOCK v. CALIFORNIA (1958)

No. 853

Decided: May 19, 1958

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Austin Clapp for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

NORTH WESTERN-HANNA FUEL CO. v. UNITED STATES, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/356/581#">356 U.S. 581 </flCite> (1958) 356 U.S. 581 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NORTH WESTERN-HANNA FUEL CO. v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 581 (1958)

356 U.S. 581

NORTH WESTERN-HANNA FUEL CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 861.
Decided May 19, 1958.

161 F. Supp. 714, affirmed.

John F. Donelan and Lee Loevinger for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Curtis H. Berg for the Canadian National Railway Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. [356 U.S. 581, 582]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law