COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. LOEW'S INC. 356 U.S. 43 (1958)

United States Supreme Court

COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. LOEW'S INC. (1958)

No. 90

Argued: January 29, 1958 Decided: March 17, 1958

239 F.2d 532, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

W. B. Carman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Homer I. Mitchell, Warren M. Christopher, Loyd Wright and Dudley K. Wright.

Herman F. Selvin argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Joseph P. Loeb.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

FORMAN v. APFEL, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/356/43#">356 U.S. 43 </flCite> (1958) 356 U.S. 43 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FORMAN v. APFEL, 356 U.S. 43 (1958)

356 U.S. 43

FORMAN ET UX. v. APFEL, LIQUIDATING RECEIVER, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT.
No. 726.
Decided March 17, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 390 Pa. 161, 134 A. 2d 662.

Thomson F. Edwards for appellants.

A. D. Caesar and Nathan I. Miller for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [356 U.S. 43, 44]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law