POGOR v. NEW YORK 356 U.S. 341 (1958)

United States Supreme Court

POGOR v. NEW YORK (1958)

No. 874

Decided: April 28, 1958

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 3 N. Y. 2d 836, 941, 144 N. E. 2d 722, 145 N. E. 2d 387.

Bernard Tompkins for appellants.

Frank S. Hogan and Richard G. Denzer for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

CHAUFFEURS v. NEWELL, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/356/341#">356 U.S. 341 </flCite> (1958) 356 U.S. 341 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CHAUFFEURS v. NEWELL, 356 U.S. 341 (1958)

356 U.S. 341

CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS & HELPERS LOCAL UNION 795 ET AL. v. NEWELL, DOING
BUSINESS AS EL DORADO DAIRY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 847.
Decided April 28, 1958.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

181 Kan. 898, 182 Kan. 205, 317 P.2d 817, 319 P.2d 171, reversed.

Payne H. Ratner for petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Kansas is reversed. Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 98 , Third. [356 U.S. 341, 342]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network