TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY 355 U.S. 603 (1958)

United States Supreme Court

TEXAS EX REL. PAN AMER. PROD. v. CITY OF TEXAS CITY (1958)

No. 574

Decided: March 03, 1958

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 157 Tex. ___, 303 S. W. 2d 780.

Francis G. Coates for appellants.

Dow H. Heard for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/355/603#">355 U.S. 603 </flCite> (1958) 355 U.S. 603 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN, 355 U.S. 603 (1958)

355 U.S. 603

OOSTERHOUDT v. MORGAN ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF
ACCOUNTANCY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 623.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 96 So.2d 139.

Edward McCarthy and Elliott Adams for appellant.

Charles E. Pledger, Jr., Justin L. Edgerton and L. William Graham for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [355 U.S. 603, 604]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law