Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 23 N. J. 459, 129 A. 2d 567.
George H. Rosenstein for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. PREMIER PEAT MOSS CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 148.
Decided October 14, 1957.
*
147 F. Supp. 169, affirmed.
[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 149, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Premier Peat Moss Corp. et al., on appeal from the same court.
Robert W. Ginnane and B. Franklin Taylor, Jr. for appellant in No. 148.
Carl Helmetag, Jr. for appellants in No. 149.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [355 U.S. 13, 14]
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 355 U.S. 13
No. 278
Decided: October 14, 1957
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)