Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Judgment affirmed.
Thurman Arnold, Reed Miller and William T. Stephens for appellants.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Charles H. Weston for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
WHITE ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS KITSAP AUTOMATIC DISPENSER CO., ET AL.
v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 184.
Decided October 14, 1957.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 49 Wash. 2d 716, 306 P.2d 230.
S. Harold Shefelman for appellants.
John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Keith Grim and Fred C. Dorsey, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [355 U.S. 10, 11]
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 355 U.S. 10
No. 114
Decided: October 14, 1957
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)