Skip to main content

IN RE MUHLBAUER, 336 U.S. 964 (1949)

United States Supreme Court


No. 452

Decided: May 02, 1949

Treating the application in each of these cases as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied.

The CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice REED, Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, and Mr. Justice BURTON are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, Sec. 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, 1946, all 329 U.S. 672 ; Milch v. United States, 1947, 332 U.S. 789 ; Brandt v. United States, 1948, 333 U.S. 836 ; In re Eichel, 1948, 333 U.S. 865 ; Everett v. Truman, 1948, 334 U.S. 824 .

Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice MURPHY, and Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE are of the opinion that argument should be heard on the motions for leave to file the petitions in order to settle what remedy, if any, the petitioners have.

Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
IN RE MUHLBAUER, 336 U.S. 964 (1949)

Citation: 336 U.S. 964

Docket No: No. 452

Decided: May 02, 1949

Court: United States Supreme Court

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard