Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Case remanded to the National Labor Relations Board. [313 U.S. 212, 213] Messrs. John P. Akolt, of Denver, Colo., James J. Cosgrove, of Ponca City, Okl., and Elmer L. Brock, of Denver, Colo., for petitioner.
[313 U.S. 212, 214] Mr. Thomas E. Harris, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.
In its petition the Continental Oil Company challenged various provisions of an order of the Labor Board which the Circuit Court of Appeals had enforced, but we brought here only so much of the case as pertained to the reinstatement of two men, Jones and Moore. 311 U.S. 637 , 61 S.Ct. 72, 85 L.Ed. --. Continental's contention is that reinstatement was precluded because neither man remained an 'employee' within 2(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. 152(3). The decisive question, however, as we have ruled in the Phelps Dodge case, Phelps Dodge Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 313 U.S. 177 , 61 S.Ct. 845, 85 L.Ed. --, decided this day, is whether reinstatement will 'effectuate the policies' of the Act. We therefore remand the case for an exercise by the Board of its judgment on that issue, in light of our opinion in the Phelps Dodge case. So ordered.
Remanded.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS took no part in the consideration or disposition of this case.
The CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice STONE reiterate the views expressed by them in the Phelps Dodge case.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice MURPHY are of opinion that the Board's order should be affirmed for the reasons set forth by them in the Phelps Dodge case.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 313 U.S. 212
Docket No: No. 413
Argued: March 11, 1941
Decided: April 28, 1941
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)