Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Messrs. Seth W. Richardson, of Fargo, N. D., and John Burke, of Bismarck, N. D., for appellants.
Mr. David F. Simpson, of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees.
This cause is restored to the docket for reargument on all the questions involved, particularly including the following:
No. 1. Whether the North Dakota statute of 1922 differs materially in its provisions and operations from the statute of 1919 which was held invalid by this court in Lemke v. Farmers' Grain Co.,
No. 2. Whether and to what extent section 17 of the statute of 1922 gives effect to and continues in force the provisions of the statute of 1919.
No. 3. Whether and in what particulars the statute of 1922 encroaches upon the field of regulation occupied by the United States grain standards act or conflicts with that act or with its administration.[ Shafer v. Farmers' Grain Co of Embden
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Citation: 266 U.S. 593
No. 34
Decided: January 05, 1925
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)