Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
January 5, 1925 [266 U.S. 473, 474] Messrs. Challen B. Ellis and Wade H. Ellis, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant,
Mr. Merrill E. Otis, of St. Joseph, Mo., for appellees.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.
The court below decided this cause upon authority of its opinion in Behn, Meyer & Co., Limited, v. Thomas W. Miller et al., 296 F. 1002, 54 App. D. C. 255, which upon appeal became No. 343 on our docket, 266 U.S. 457 , 45 S. Ct. 165, 69 L. Ed. --. The decree therein has been reversed for reasons stated in the opinion just announced. The two causes present the same issues. Consequently the challenged decree herein also must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity with our conclusions.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 266 U.S. 473
Docket No: No. 412
Argued: November 25, 1924
Decided: November 25, 1924
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)