Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
February 19, 1923
Mr. Thomas J. Johnston, of New York, City, for Concrete Steel Co.
Messrs. O. Ellery Edwards, of New York City, and Carlos P. Griffin of San Francisco, Cal., for Vandenburgh.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a review of the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit, sustaining the validity of claim No. 3 of the Vandenburgh patent, just considered in the previous case of Vandenburgh v. Truscon Steel Co., 261 U.S. 6 , 43 Sup. Ct. 331, 67 L. Ed. -- and awarding $15,000 for profits to Vandenburgh for defendant's infringement. The two cases cannot be distinguished. We must therefore reverse [261 U.S. 16, 17] the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit, and direct the dismissal of the bill.
Reversed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 261 U.S. 16
Docket No: No. 238
Argued: January 17, 1923
Decided: January 17, 1923
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)