Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Messrs. Helm Bruce and Edward S. Jouett, both of Louisville, Ky., for appellant.
Mr. Joseph W. Folk, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court.
This case was submitted with Smith v. Interstate Commerce Com'n, 245 U.S. 33 , 38 Sup. Ct. 30, 62 L. Ed. --, and Id., 245 U.S. 47 , 38 Sup. Ct. 34, 62 L. Ed. -- (Nos. 337 and 339). Like them it is a proceeding to compel appellant to* [245 U.S. 48, 49] answer certain questions asked him by the Interstate Commerce Commission. It was based on a petition like the petitions in those cases to which there was a like reply.
The court entered an order requiring appellant to answer the following questions asked by counsel for the Commission:
The questions are similar to those passed on in the other two cases, and the order is
Affirmed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 245 U.S. 48
Docket No: No. 340
Decided: November 05, 1917
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)