Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Messrs. William H. Sexton and John W. Beckwith for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Allen B. Chilcoat and Stephen A. Day for defendants in error.
Memorandum opinion, by direction of the court, by Mr. Chief Justice White:
This is a companion case to Preston v. Chicago, No. 195, just disposed of [ 226 U.S. 447 , 57 L. ed. --, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 177]. Unlike the record in the Preston Case, however, the record in this case does not contain the final judgment to which the writ of error is directed. As we cannot assume that a judgment was in fact entered in the supreme court of Illinois, it results that we are without authority to exert jurisdiction.
Writ of error dismissed.[ People of State of Illinois ex rel Gersch v. City of Chicago 226 U.S. 451 (1913) ]
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 226 U.S. 451
Docket No: No. 474
Decided: January 06, 1913
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)