Skip to main content

GRIFFITH v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT , 218 U.S. 572 (1910)

United States Supreme Court

GRIFFITH v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT(1910)

No. 515

Decided: December 12, 1910


Submitted November 28, 1910.

Mr. I. Henry Harris for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Hugh M. Alcorn for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

The parties to this record are the same as in No. 514, just decided [ 218 U.S. 563 , 54 L. ed. 1151, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 132], and the questions involved are the same, the prosecution being for similar offenses against the Connecticut act of 1907. Both cases were tried together. Upon the conviction in this, however, the trial court imposed the penalty of imprisonment. The two cases were disposed of by the supreme court of errors in one opinion. As the decision in No. 514 is necessarily controlling, it follows that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut must be and it is affirmed.[ Griffith v. State of Connecticut 218 U.S. 572 (1910) ]

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
GRIFFITH v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT , 218 U.S. 572 (1910)

Citation: 218 U.S. 572

Docket No: No. 515

Decided: December 12, 1910

Court: United States Supreme Court

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard