Skip to main content

BALTIMORE & O S W R CO v. US , 216 U.S. 617 (1910)

United States Supreme Court

BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S(1910)

No. 124

Decided: March 14, 1910

Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error. [216 U.S. 617, 618]   Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio.

Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that day.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
BALTIMORE & O S W R CO v. US , 216 U.S. 617 (1910)

Citation: 216 U.S. 617

Docket No: No. 124

Decided: March 14, 1910

Court: United States Supreme Court

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard