Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BALTIMORE & O S W R CO v. US , 216 U.S. 617 (1910)
United States Supreme Court
BALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S(1910)
No. 124
Decided: March 14, 1910
Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error. [216 U.S. 617, 618] Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio.
Rehearing granted and cases restored to the docket for reargument and assigned to be heard on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after the cases already assigned for that day.
Was this helpful?
BALTIMORE & O S W R CO v. US , 216 U.S. 617 (1910)
Citation: 216 U.S. 617
Docket No: No. 124
Decided: March 14, 1910
Court: United States Supreme Court
For Legal Professionals
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Get email updates from FindLaw Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Need to find an attorney?
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)