Skip to main content

MOORE v. US EX REL NEWCOMB MOTOR CO , 216 U.S. 608 (1910)

United States Supreme Court


No. 115

Decided: March 07, 1910

Messrs. Frederick P. Fish, Melville Church, and Albert G. Davis for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Charles H. Duell, Robert N. Kenyon, and Walter F. Rogers for defendant in error.

Per Curiam: The Writ of Error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U.S. 1 , 53 L. ed. 65, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 6; Rousseau v. Brown, 21 App. D. C. 73, 80; Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U.S. 284 , 53 L. ed. 515, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 390; E. C. Atkins & Co. v. Moore, 212 U.S. 285 , 53 L. ed. 515, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 390; Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U.S. 561 , 53 L. ed. 652, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 688; Gaines v. Knecht, 27 App. D. C. 530, 532; United States ex rel. Taylor v. Taft, 203 U.S. 461 , 51 L. ed. 269, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148; United States v. Lynch, 137 U.S. 280 , 34 L. ed. 700, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 114; Baltimore & P. R. Co. v. Hopkins, 130 U.S. 210, 226 , 32 S. L. ed. 908, 914, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 503. The application for Certiorari is also denied.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
MOORE v. US EX REL NEWCOMB MOTOR CO , 216 U.S. 608 (1910)

Citation: 216 U.S. 608

Docket No: No. 115

Decided: March 07, 1910

Court: United States Supreme Court

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard