Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Messrs. William V. Rowe, R. S. Lovett, Ralph Oakley, and James A. Baker for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. C. K. Bell for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:
The Southern Cotton Oil Company is a New Jersey corporation doing business in the state of Texas by virtue of a permit issued June 3, 1897, under the laws of the state. The object of this suit is to forfeit the permit of the company for the violation of the anti-trust statutes of the state. The violation of the statutes alleged against it is the same as that alleged against the National Cotton Oil Company in No. 37. [National Cotton Oil Co. v. Texas,
The questions are identical with those presented in No. 37, and on its authority the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 197 U.S. 134
No. 38
Decided: February 27, 1905
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)