Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Mr. Milton Smith for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Charles R. Brock, Henry A. Lindsley, and Halsted L. Ritter for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:
This action was brought in the police court of the city of [192 U.S. 115, 116] Denver, state of Colorado, to collect $500, for the violation of 746 of ordinance No. 101 of the city. Plaintiff in error was found guilty, and fined the sum of $50. On appeal to the county court he was also found guilty, and fined $100. The judgment was affirmed by the supreme court of the state, and thereupon the Chief Justice of the state allowed this writ of error.
The case involves the constitutionality of 745 and 746 of the ordinance of the city of Denver. That question was passed upon in Cronin v. Adams, 192 U.S. 108 , ante, 219, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 219, just decided, and on its authority the judgment is affirmed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 192 U.S. 115
Docket No: No. 101
Argued: December 16, 1903
Decided: January 04, 1904
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)