Skip to main content

HOOD v. WALLACE , 182 U.S. 555 (1901)

United States Supreme Court


No. 179

Argued: March 11, 1901Decided: March 11, 1901

May 27, 1901

Messrs. C. N. Sterry, Eugene Hagen, and I. E. Lambert for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Wm. C. Cochran, J. McD. Trimble, and W. H. Wallace for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

The pleadings in this case are the same as in Lantry v. Wallace, just decided, 181 U. S. --, ante, 878, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 878. The demurrer to the answer and cross petition of Hood was sustained in an elaborate opinion by Judge Philips, holding the circuit court. 89 Fed. 11. The [182 U.S. 555, 556]   judgment in that court was affirmed in the circuit court of appeals. Lantry v. Wallace, 38 C. C. A. 510, 97 Fed. 865.

For the reasons stated in the opinion just rendered in Lantry's Case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
HOOD v. WALLACE , 182 U.S. 555 (1901)

Citation: 182 U.S. 555

Docket No: No. 179

Argued: March 11, 1901

Decided: March 11, 1901

Court: United States Supreme Court

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard