Skip to main content

LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON , 167 U.S. 203 (1897)

United States Supreme Court

LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON(1897)

Decided: May 10, 1897

The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined [167 U.S. 203, 204]   in Bank v. Nebecker (just decided) 17 Sup. Ct. 766. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice WHITE concurs in the result.

J. J. Crawford, for plaintiff in error.

Sol. Gen. Conrad, for defendant in error.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON , 167 U.S. 203 (1897)

Citation: 167 U.S. 203

Decided: May 10, 1897

Court: United States Supreme Court

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard