LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON 167 U.S. 203 (1897)

United States Supreme Court

LUMBERMAN'S NAT BANK OF WILLIAMSPORT v. HUSTON (1897)

Decided: May 10, 1897

The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined [167 U.S. 203, 204] in Bank v. Nebecker (just decided) 17 Sup. Ct. 766. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice WHITE concurs in the result.

J. J. Crawford, for plaintiff in error.

Sol. Gen. Conrad, for defendant in error.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network