Skip to main content

NATIONAL ACC. SOCIETY v. SPIRO , 164 U.S. 281 (1896)

United States Supreme Court

NATIONAL ACC. SOCIETY v. SPIRO(1896)

No. 460

Decided: November 30, 1896

H. D. McBurney, for plaintiff in error.

H. H. Ingersoll, for defendant in error.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

This is a certificate from the circuit court of appeals for the Sixth circuit, propounding, after a preliminary statement, the following question:

    'Does a defendant, by filing a petition in a state court for removal of the cause to the United States court, in general terms, unaccompanied by a plea in abatement, and without specifying or restricting the purpose of his appearance, thereby waive objection to the jurisdiction of the court for want of sufficient service of the summons?' 18 C. C. A. 382, 71 Fed. 897.

For the reasons given and on the authorities cited in the above cause of Railway Co. v. Brow, 17 Sup. Ct. 126, the question must be answered in the negative. Certificate accordingly.

Mr. Justice BREWER and Mr. Justice PECKHAM dissented.[ National Acc. Society v. Spiro 164 U.S. 281 (1896) ]

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
NATIONAL ACC. SOCIETY v. SPIRO , 164 U.S. 281 (1896)

Citation: 164 U.S. 281

Docket No: No. 460

Decided: November 30, 1896

Court: United States Supreme Court

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard