Skip to main content

PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL BRYANT v. HOLLADAY , 159 U.S. 415 (1895)

United States Supreme Court

PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL BRYANT v. HOLLADAY(1895)

No. 566

Decided: November 11, 1895

[159 U.S. 415, 417]   Wm. Matthews and Wm. Craig, for plaintiff in error.

S. W. Holladay and E. Burke Holladay, for defendants in error.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

The opinions of the supreme court of California in this case are reported 68 Cal. 439, 9 Pac. 655; 93 Cal. 241, 29 Pac. 54; 102 Cal. 661, 36 Pac. 927. The motion to dismiss is sustained on the authority of San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U.S. 65 , 10 Sup. Ct. 241; Beatty v. Benton, 135 U.S. 244 , 10 Sup. Ct. 747; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U.S. 361 , 14 Sup. Ct. 131, and cases cited. And see Hoadley v. San Francisco, 94 U.S. 4 ; Hoadley's Adm'r v. San Francisco, 124 U.S. 639 , 8 Sup. Ct. 659.

Writ of error dismissed.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL BRYANT v. HOLLADAY , 159 U.S. 415 (1895)

Citation: 159 U.S. 415

Docket No: No. 566

Decided: November 11, 1895

Court: United States Supreme Court

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard