Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Chas. A. Maxwell and Geo. S. Chase, for the Cherokee Nation.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Dodge, for the United States.
Charles Brownell, for appellee.
Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the opinion of the court.
This case is similar to that just decided, in which the same parties were appellants, and Charles Journeycake, principal [155 U.S. 218, 219] chief, etc., defendant. 15 Sup. Ct. 55. The petition was filed under the authority of the same act of October 1, 1890 (26 Stat. 636), and to enforce the claim of the Shawnee Indians domiciled in the Cherokee Nation to an equal interest in the Cherokee Reservation and Outlet, and the proceeds and profits thereof.
In pursuance of article 15 of the treaty of July 19, 1866, an agreement was, on June 7, 1869, entered into between the Shawnees and the Cherokee Nation, through their representatives, the substantial portions of which are as follows:
The rights of the petitioners are to be determined by this agreement in the light of article 15 of the treaty. The principal difference between this contract and that made between the Cherokees and the Delawares consists in the fact that in this there is no provision for the purchase of 'homes' or any payment of moneys on account thereof into the national fund of the Cherokees; but, nevertheless, there is the express stipulation 'that the said Shawnees shall be incorporated into, and ever after remain a part of, the Cherokee Nation, on equal terms in every respect and with all the privileges and immunities of native citizens of said Cherokee Nation.'
For the reasons stated in the opinion in the former case, it must be held that this stipulation secured to the Shawnees equal rights with the native Cherokees in that which was the common property of the Cherokee Nation, to wit, the reservation and the outlet, as well as all profits and proceeds thereof. [155 U.S. 218, 221] So far, therefore, as the appellants are concerned, there was no error in the decree.
There is an application by the appellee for a modification of the decree increasing the sums awarded per capita to the Shawnees. It is enough to say in reference to this application that no appeal was taken by the appellee. Without an appeal, a party will not be heard in an appellate court to question the correctness of the decree of the trial court. The Stephen Morgan, 94 U.S. 599 .
The decree of the court of claims is affirmed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 155 U.S. 218
Docket No: No. 671
Decided: November 19, 1894
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)