Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
F. S. Richards, for the motion.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.
When this case was before the court on the former appeal, (
The decree of the supreme court of the territory of Utah, then under consideration, was in the main affirmed, with a modification in the seventh clause thereof; the decree of this court in the premises being as follows:
The mandate of this court having gone down, further proceedings were had in the supreme court of the territory of Utah, which resulted in the entry of the following order or decree by that court on November 12, 1892, to wit:
From this decree an appeal was taken by the United States to this court. The appellee now moves that the decree of the court below be reversed, and a decree entered here, in effectuation of the terms of a joint resolution of congress approved October 25, 1893, and that the cause be remanded to the court below with instructions to take such further proceedings as may be necessary to carry into effect such decree of this court. Due notice havinb been given, the United States, without opposing or consenting to the motion, submitted the matter to the court, stating that the government did not appear to have any further interest in the cause, the subject-matter involved having been disposed of by the joint resolution or congress, but suggesting that the case should be remanded to the supreme court of the territory of Utah for such decree there as might be proper to be made therein.
By the resolution of congress referred to it was 'resolved, [150 U.S. 145, 149] by the senate and house of representatives of the United States of America in congress assembled, that the said personal property and money now in the hands of such receiver, not arising from the sale or rents of real estate since March third, eighteen hundred and eighty-seven, be, and the same is hereby, restored to the said Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, to be applied under the direction and control of the first presidency of said church to the charitable uses and purposes thereof; that is to say, for the payment of the debts for which said church is legally or equitable liable, for the relief of the poor and distressed members of said church, for the education of the children of such members, and for the building and repair of houses of worship for the use of said church, but in which the rightfulness of the practice of polygamy shall not be inculcated. And the said receiver, after deducting the expenses of his receivership, under the direction of the said supreme court of the territory of Utah, is hereby required to deliver the said property and money to the persons now constituting the presidency of said church, or to such person or persons as they may designate, to be held and applied generally to the charitable uses and purposes of said church as aforesaid.'
It will be perceived that judicial action is not sought to be controlled by the resolution, but that this court having indicated the mode to be pursued to ascertain and define the particular charitable uses, lawful in their character, to which the property should be devoted, in the absence of legislation upon the subject, and this appeal from the decree of the court below to that end having been taken, congress has now declared such uses. This disposition of the property by the United States renders any further consideration of the case here unnecessary, and the decree below is reversed, and the cause remanded to the supreme court of Utah territory for such further proceedings as to law and justice may appertain, in conformity with the provisions of the aforesaid resolution of congress.
Ordered accordingly.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 150 U.S. 145
No. 887
Decided: November 06, 1893
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)