Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Chas. B. Wilby, for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.
Judgment was rendered in this case by the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of Ohio on April 25, 1891. An entry was made of record, June 19, 1891, that the court 'allows a writ of error to the supreme court of the United States, with stay of execution, upon the filing of a supersedeas bond,' as described, and such a bond was filed and approved June 20, 1891. A petition for the allowance of the writ of error and an assignment of errors were filed in the clerk's office of the circuit court, July 3, 1891, and the writ of error bears teste and was filed in that office on that day, and a citation to the adverse party signed and served.
The motion to dismiss must be sustained upon the authority of Wauton v. De Wolf,
Writ of error dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 146 U.S. 54
No. 872
Decided: October 31, 1892
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)