ORDER LIST 10/02/14 (2014)

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2014

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

126, ORIG. KANSAS V. NEBRASKA AND COLORADO

13-433 INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS V. BUSK, JESSE, ET AL.

The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to participate

in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument are

granted.

13-435 OMNICARE, INC., ET AL. V. LABORERS DIST. COUNCIL, ET AL.

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate

in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is

granted. The time is to be divided as follows: 30 minutes

for the petitioners, 20 minutes for the respondents, and 10

minutes for the Solicitor General.

13-517 WARGER, GREGORY P. V. SHAUERS, RANDY D.

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate

in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is

granted.

13-534 NC BD. OF DENTAL EXAMINERS V. FTC

The motion of American Optometric Association, et al. for

leave to file a brief as amici curiae out of time is denied.

13-854 TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. SANDOZ, INC., ET AL.

The motion of petitioners for leave to file Volume 4 of the

joint appendix under seal is granted. The motion of the

Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as

amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted.

13-975 T-MOBILE SOUTH V. ROSWELL, GA

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate

in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is

granted.

APPEAL - JURISDICTION POSTPONED

13-1314 AZ STATE LEGISLATURE V. AZ INDEP. REDISTRICTING, ET AL.

Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is

postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits limited to the following questions: 1) Do the Elections Clause of the United States Constitution and 2 U. S. C. §2a(c) permit Arizona's use of a commission to adopt congressional districts?

2) Does the Arizona Legislature have standing to bring this suit?

CERTIORARI GRANTED

13-550 TIBBLE, GLENN, ET AL. V. EDISON INTERNATIONAL, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to

the following question: "Whether a claim that ERISA plan

fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by offering

higher-cost retail-class mutual funds to plan participants, even

though identical lower-cost institution-class mutual funds were

available, is barred by 29 U. S. C. §1113(1) when fiduciaries

initially chose the higher-cost mutual funds as plan investments

more than six years before the claim was filed."

13-1333 COLEMAN, ANDRE L. V. TOLLEFSON, TODD, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

13-1352 OHIO V. CLARK, DARIUS

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is

granted.

13-1371 TX DEPT. HOUS. & COM. AFFAIRS V. INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES PROJECT

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to

Question 1 presented by the petition.

13-1402 KERRY, SEC. OF STATE, ET AL. V. DIN, FAUZIA

13-1499 WILLIAMS-YULEE, LANELL V. FLORIDA BAR

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

13-9972 RODRIGUEZ, DENNYS V. UNITED STATES

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

14-15 ARMSTRONG, RICHARD, ET AL. V. EXCEPTIONAL CHILD CENTER, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to

Question 1 presented by the petition.

14-86 EEOC V. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES, INC.

14-103 BAKER BOTTS, L.L.P., ET AL. V. ASARCO, L.L.C.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.