Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
(ORDER LIST: 564 U.S.)
TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 2011
CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
09-10246 GOINS, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES
The Court reversed the judgment below in Freeman v. United
States, 564 U.S. ___ (2011). Therefore, the petition for a writ
of certiorari is granted, and the case is remanded to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further
proceedings.
10-113 RIVERA-MARTINEZ, ROBIN E. V. UNITED STATES
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The
judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United
States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit for further
consideration in light of Freeman v. United States, 564
U.S. ___ (2011).
10-250 DOW CHEMICAL CANADA ULC V. FANDINO, CARLOS O., ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The
judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of
Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further
consideration in light of J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v.
Nicastro, 564 U.S. ___ (2011).
10-984 IMS HEALTH, INC., ET AL. V. SCHNEIDER, ATT'Y GEN. OF ME
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The
judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United
States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit for further
consideration in light of Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564
U.S. ___ (2011).
10-5479 BARBA, ANTONIO V. CALIFORNIA
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court
of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further
consideration in light of Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S.
___ (2011).
10-6258 CARRIGAN, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further
consideration in light of Freeman v. United States, 564 U.S.
___ (2011).
10-6278 DILBOY, ANTHONY V. NEW HAMPSHIRE
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Supreme
Court of New Hampshire for further consideration in light of
Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. ___ (2011).
10-7139 CEPEDA, DOMINGO V. UNITED STATES
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United
States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit for further
consideration in light of Freeman v. United States, 564 U.S.
___ (2011).
10-7565 SYLVESTER, SHAWN V. UNITED STATES
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further
consideration in light of Freeman v. United States, 564 U.S.
___ (2011).
CERTIORARI GRANTED
10-1062 SACKETT, CHANTELL, ET VIR V. EPA, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to
the following questions: 1. May petitioners seek pre-enforcement
judicial review of the administrative compliance order pursuant
to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U. S. C. §704? 2. If
not, does petitioners' inability to seek pre-enforcement
judicial review of the administrative compliance order violate
their rights under the Due Process Clause?
10-8505 WILLIAMS, SANDY V. ILLINOIS
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
CERTIORARI DENIED
09-10755 SMITH, JOSEPH V. FLORIDA
10-56 REINAUER TRANSPORTATION V. BROWN, GEORGE
10-75 CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP. V. BATTAGLIA, FRANCIS
10-795 GREEN PARTY OF CT, ET AL. V. LENGE, ALBERT P., ET AL.
10-966 CLEMENS, WILLIAM R. V. McNAMEE, BRIAN
10-1004 PIRELLI PNEUS LTDA V. GUNN, GARY
10-1012 DUCASSE, HEATHER V. MAINE
10-1019 ABBYY PRODUCTION V. NUANCE COMM.
10-6865 AGUILAR, MIGUEL A. V. VIRGINIA
10-8337 WILLIAMS, ANDRE V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
10-617 ROBERTS, SCOTT V. KAUFFMAN RACING EQUIPMENT
The motion of Center for Democracy & Technology for leave
to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for
a writ of certiorari is denied.
10-925 GRAND TRUNK RAILROAD V. SHEPARD, WILLIAM E.
The motion of Association of American Railroads for leave
to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for
a writ of certiorari is denied.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
No. 062811
Decided: June 28, 2011
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)