ORDER LIST 06/27/11 (2011)

(ORDER LIST: 564 U.S.)

MONDAY, JUNE 27, 2011

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

10-82 UNITED STATES V. GONZALEZ, RICARDO

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Davis v. United States, 564

U.S. ___ (2011). Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

10-1007 KENTUCKY V. VALESQUEZ, REYES

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is

granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to

the Court of Appeals of Kentucky for further consideration in

light of Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. ___ (2011).

10-1087 THOROGOOD, STEVEN J., ET AL. V. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The

judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further

consideration in light of Smith v. Bayer Corp., 564 U.S. ___

(2011).

10-1091 COLORADO V. KEY, JEFFREY A.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The

judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of

Appeals of Colorado for further consideration in light of Davis

v. United States, 564 U.S. ___ (2011).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

10M115 CORSON, DAVID C. V. MATTOX, PAUL A., ET AL.

The motion for leave to proceed as a seaman is denied.

10M116 VERDUGO, FABIAN V. UNITED STATES

The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of

certiorari under seal is granted.

10M117 SAVICH, PAUL F. V. DOMRES, KARMEN

10M118 PAYNE, CHANIKKA D. V. FISCHER, COMM'R, NY DOC, ET AL.

The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs

of certiorari out of time are denied.

10-768 AFTERMATH RECORDS, ET AL. V. F.B.T. PROD., LLC, ET AL.

The motion of respondents for attorneys' fees and expenses is denied.

10-10177 JONES, WILLIAM H. V. MERCK & COMPANY, INC.

10-10485 MATTHEWS, ROBERT R. V. SHINSEKI, SEC. OF VA

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis are denied. Petitioners are allowed until July 18,

2011, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule

38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of

the Rules of this Court.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

10-224 NAT'L MEAT ASS'N V. HARRIS, ATT'Y GEN. OF CA, ET AL.

The motion of American Association of Swine Veterinarians,

et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

10-704 MESSERSCHMIDT, CURT, ET AL. V. MILLENDER, AUGUSTA, ET AL.

10-844 CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL, ET AL. V. NOVO NORDISK A/S, ET AL.

10-1016 COLEMAN, DANIEL V. COURT OF APPEALS OF MD, ET AL.

10-1121 KNOX, DIANNE, ET AL. V. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT'L UNION

10-1195 MIMS, MARCUS D. V. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC

10-1219 KAPPOS, DAVID J. V. HYATT, GILBERT P.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.

10-1259 UNITED STATES V. JONES, ANTOINE

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. In addition

to the question presented by the petition, the parties are

directed to brief and argue the following question: "Whether

the government violated respondent's Fourth Amendment rights by

installing the GPS tracking device on his vehicle without a

valid warrant and without his consent."

10-1261 CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES, ET AL. V. SIMMONDS, VANESSA

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The Chief

Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

10-1265 MARTEL, WARDEN V. CLAIR, KENNETH

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

10-1293 FCC, ET AL. V. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to

the following question: "Whether the Federal Communications

Commission's current indecency-enforcement regime violates the

First or Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution."

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision

of this petition.

CERTIORARI DENIED

09-1254 VON SAHER, MAREI V. NORTON SIMON MUSEUM, ET AL.

09-1313 SALEH, HAIDAR M., ET AL. V. TITAN CORP., ET AL.

10-330 BROWN, GOV. OF CA, ET AL. V. RINCON BAND OF LUISENO, ET AL.

10-374 ZURESS, LISA M. V. DONLEY, SEC. OF AIR FORCE

10-638 WETHERILL, NANCY J. V. McHUGH, SEC. OF ARMY, ET AL.

10-735 PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., ET AL. V. JACKSON, DEANIA M.

10-786 SPAIN, ET AL. V. CASSIRER, CLAUDE

10-827 UNITED STATES, EX REL. SUMMERS V. LHC GROUP, INC.

10-885 WITT, ALEXIS V. UNITED STATES

10-920 OCHOA, ANA R. V. HOLDER, ATT'Y GEN.

10-940 GOR, TUSHAR P. V. HOLDER, ATT'Y GEN.

10-1036 ZARNOW, DELORES A. V. WICHITA FALLS, TX, ET AL.

10-1084 FERGUSON, COREY V. UNITED STATES

10-1093 SMITH, JOSEPH, ET UX. V. GEORGIA

10-1102 ROSARIO, JOSEFA V. HOLDER, ATT'Y GEN.

10-1158 NETTLES, J. D. V. LEESBURG, FL, ET AL.

10-1166 GROSE, BEVERLY V. CORR. MED. SERVICES, ET AL.

10-1171 THOMAS, LINDA A. V. LA DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES

10-1185 LIGON, JACK W. V. LaHOOD, SEC. OF TRANSPORTATION

10-1299 MILLER, JOSEPHINE S. V. PRAXAIR, INC., ET AL.

10-1301 BASS, HARRISTON L. V. NEVADA

10-1305 EVANS-MARSHALL, SHELLEY V. BD. OF EDUCATION, ET AL.

10-1306 COX, DALLAS V. MISSOURI

10-1308 JAEGER, DINA V. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, ET AL.

10-1311 BLUE BELL CREAMERIES V. ROBERTS, RICHARD

10-1313 CLELLAN, JOHN V. OHIO

10-1317 MILES CHRISTI RELIGIOUS ORDER V. NORTHVILLE, MI, ET AL.

10-1319 JAKUBOWSKI, MARTIN V. CHRIST HOSPITAL, INC., ET AL.

10-1321 REYNOLDS, JAMES J. V. HOLDER, ATT'Y GEN.

10-1330 JONES, KENNEDY V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.

10-1381 SACKS, LINDA M. V. SACKS, DAVID, ET AL.

10-1397 COX, ALICE V. DeSOTO COUNTY, MS

10-1406 LEITCH, GORDON V. MERKLEY, JEFF

10-1419 PULLINS, SCOTT A. V. DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

10-7013 LITTLEJOHN, MICHAEL A. V. WISCONSIN

10-7057 DEARBORN, DAVID A. V. WISCONSIN

10-8321 MELTON, LUKE L. V. UNITED STATES

10-8434 DAVIS, CHARLES R. V. HOBBS, DIR., AR DOC, ET AL.

10-8448 BOWES, KIMORN V. UNITED STATES

10-8800 VOGT, ROBERT P. V. NORTH CAROLINA

10-8876 JAUHARI, SABU A. V. UNITED STATES

10-8969 ) WILSON, KERN C. V. UNITED STATES

)

10-9194 ) HEINRICH, DURWANDA E. V. UNITED STATES

10-9090 PAYNE, REX A. V. UNITED STATES

10-9299 ARZOLA, ARSENIO V. UNITED STATES

10-9620 FARMER, TYLER G. V. UNITED STATES

10-9651 ABU-JIHAAD, HASSAN V. UNITED STATES

10-9727 HODGE, KENNETH V. OHIO

10-9873 STROMAN, MARK A. V. THALER, DIR., TX DCJ

10-10055 LAWLER, RACHEL Y., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

10-10080 RIOS, JIMMY D. V. USDC WD NC

10-10091 HERNANDEZ, TONY J. V. NEOTTI, WARDEN, ET AL.

10-10100 McCALLEY, BRYSON V. CALIFORNIA

10-10101 McKAUGHAN, COY V. TENNESSEE

10-10102 PERKINS, DARIUS V. ILLINOIS

10-10109 McNEAL, TROY T. V. ADAMS, WARDEN, ET AL.

10-10110 McCUNE, MARK V. McCUNE, SIGRID

10-10111 TUCKER, NEIL V. LaCLAIRE, WARDEN

10-10112 WADE, BRADLEY V. GEORGIA

10-10121 SALINAS, GARY J. V. THALER, DIR., TX DCJ

10-10122 RAMIREZ, JORGE A. V. TEXAS

10-10124 ROCHA, MARCO V. CCCF ADMINISTRATION, ET AL.

10-10125 ROBINSON, DIANE V. HOUSTON, JULIAN T., ET AL.

10-10137 REID, TIMOTHY V. OHIO

10-10142 ROSE, SUSAN V. UTAH, ET AL.

10-10143 RHODES, BERNARD V. KNOWLES, WARDEN, ET AL.

10-10147 CROCK, THOMAS V. PENNSYLVANIA

10-10153 WILLIAMS, ABE V. MARTEL, WARDEN, ET AL.

10-10155 BOOK, ETHAN V. MENDOZA, ROBERT, ET AL.

10-10162 ANDREWS, ANTONIO A. V. MISSOURI

10-10164 BROWN, TYREE W. V. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.

10-10167 WHITLOW, CHARLES, ET UX. V. CUBILLO, PEDRO P.

10-10170 CHEESEMAN, ROBERT V. GARRISON, RANDOLPH L., ET AL.

10-10175 OLIVO, JESUS V. TEXAS

10-10178 JOHNSON, WILLIAM E. V. TEXAS

10-10182 McCREARY, CARNELL V. GRANHOLM, JENNIFER, ET AL.

10-10186 JAMES, PIERRE V. REDNOUR, DAVID

10-10187 WILLIAMS, JEROME A. V. HOOKS, WARDEN

10-10191 OYENIK, RONALD E. V. SCHAFF, THOMAS, ET AL.

10-10193 MARTINEZ, CHRISTINA V. TEXAS

10-10199 DUELL, RICHARD V. CONWAY, SUPT., ATTICA

10-10201 RUSSELL, TIMOTHY V. CALIFORNIA

10-10204 ST. JOHN, STEPHEN M. V. HOLDER, ATT'Y. GEN.

10-10205 DENNIS, SHEILA V. NORTH MIAMI, FL, ET AL.

10-10209 WILLIAMS, REGINA V. PRUDDEN, WARDEN

10-10211 McCARTHY, PATRICK V. SCOFIELD, ALISON, ET AL.

10-10228 BRESTLE, GARY C. V. UNITED STATES

10-10245 BRADLEY, TERRY J. V. TERRELL, WARDEN

10-10291 HATTON, DARRELL D. V. VA EMPLOY. COMMISSION

10-10306 KING, ADRIAN V. SHERRY, WARDEN

10-10328 POWELL, TYRONE V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

10-10365 GRAY, MALCOLM L. V. COX, JAMES G., ET AL.

10-10385 BEAN, JAMES V. ILLINOIS

10-10424 WILLARD, TIKILA V. HICKSON, WARDEN, ET AL.

10-10461 JARVIS, DEREK N. V. ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES

10-10535 BAHENA, ANTONIO V. CALIFORNIA

10-10540 WATSON, EDWARD V. CLARKE, DIR., VA DOC

10-10567 SAWYER, JEROME V. STEWARD, WARDEN

10-10614 SUMPTER, VINCENT V. UNITED STATES

10-10618 SMEAD, MARK E. V. OHIO

10-10622 DADI, PATRICIA E., ET VIR V. DANZIG, RICHARD A.

10-10634 CANNON, AMESHEO D. V. UNITED STATES

10-10645 BROOKS, JASON S. V. UNITED STATES

10-10653 JOHNSON, ALBERT L. V. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION

10-10654 KELLER, JOHN J. V. UNITED STATES

10-10657 DANIELS, MARK J. V. UNITED STATES

10-10658 CHANDLER, BRANDON L. V. UNITED STATES

10-10660 COCKERHAM, MELISSA V. UNITED STATES

10-10661 DELGADO, LAZARO V. UNITED STATES

10-10663 MENDOZA-MENDOZA, DARIO V. UNITED STATES

10-10664 BAHENA-BAHENA, ARMANDO V. UNITED STATES

10-10665 BRISENO-MARIN, PEDRO V. UNITED STATES

10-10667 BETEMIT, ALBERT V. UNITED STATES

10-10669 SCHUETT, CLIFFORD J. V. UNITED STATES

10-10671 McDONALD, CURTIS V. UNITED STATES

10-10680 PIERCE, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES

10-10685 ARNOLD, TIFFANY V. UNITED STATES

10-10687 VAUGHT, DAVID V. UNITED STATES

10-10708 WADDELL, REGINALD A. V. UNITED STATES

10-10739 POLLARD, MELVIN V. YOST, WARDEN

10-10746 ACREY, MICHAEL D. V. UNITED STATES

10-10759 GLADNEY, WILLIAM L. V. UNITED STATES

10-10764 SMITH, TIMOTHY D. V. UNITED STATES

10-10766 DUCKETT, ERVIN A. V. UNITED STATES

10-10769 McCUTCHEN, ANTHONY D. V. UNITED STATES

10-10771 AGUIRRE, ALEJANDRO Y. V. UNITED STATES

10-10772 BLOOD, GIOVANNI D. V. UNITED STATES

10-10773 AGUILAR-ARRAIZA, JOSE L. V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

10-537 OSAGE NATION V. IRBY, CONSTANCE, ET AL.

10-627 NEW YORK, NY V. PERMANENT MISSION OF INDIA

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice

Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of these

petitions.

10-1049 ) LARSON, JOHN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

)

10-1061 ) RUBLE, RAYMOND J. V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice

Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of these

petitions.

10-1147 ) WHITE & CASE LLP V. UNITED STATES

)

10-1176 ) NOSSAMAN LLP, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice

Alito and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or

decision of these petitions.

10-1173 SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT, ET AL. V. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice

Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

10-1218 SIMMONDS, VANESSA V. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The Chief

Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

10-1249 TROPP, RICHARD A. V. CORPORATION OF LLOYD'S

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice

Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this

petition.

10-1302 PUIATTI, CARL V. BUSS, SEC., FL DOC

The motion of Center for Constitutional Rights, et al.

for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The

motion of Florida Capital Resource Center for leave to file

a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a

for a writ of certiorari is denied.

10-1303 HEYDT-BENJAMIN, AVA V. HEYDT-BENJAMIN, THOMAS

The motion of Professor Linda D. Elrod, et al. for leave

to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for

a writ of certiorari is denied.

10-10108 BURNETT, EVERETT A. V. SPERRY, DONNA, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari

is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

10-10158 WILLIAMS, THELMA V. WRIGHT, JUDGE, USDC ED AR, ET AL

10-10159 WILLIAMS, THELMA V. JOHNSON, LT., ET AL.

10-10160 WILLIAMS, THELMA V. CROUCH, ET AL.

10-10181 McCREARY, CARNELL V. WERTANEN, RICKY, ET AL.

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari

are dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioners have

repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed

not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from

petitioners unless the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a)

are paid and the petitions are submitted in compliance with Rule

33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506

U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

10-10699 RAY, FRED V. UNITED STATES

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari

is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

10-10822 IN RE NIVEEN ISMAIL

10-10843 IN RE JAMES HARMON, III

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

MANDAMUS DENIED

10-10173 IN RE TERRY G. PARNELL

The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

10-10138 IN RE SUSAN ROSE

The petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is

denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

09-10053 MITCHELL, DENNIS V. UNITED STATES

10-1098 THREATT, KENIKA M. V. DONOVAN, SEC. OF HUD

10-9000 LEWIS, RONALD V. RICCI, ADM'R, NJ, ET AL.

10-9032 GUYTON, DENNIS V. HUNT, SCOTT

10-9061 LEE, JAY H. V. FEMA, ET AL.

10-9252 TAFARI, INJAH V. WEINSTOCK, DANIEL, ET AL.

10-9277 HAMMER, NANCY V. FOREST HIGHLANDS

10-9486 PONTON, DONNELL V. AFSCME, AFL-CIO, ET AL.

10-9896 NORWOOD, MARILYN M. V. UNIV. OF AR, BD. OF TRUSTEES

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

10-9732 HAQUE, SERAJUL V. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS

10-9737 HAQUE, SERAJUL V. DEPT. OF HOMELAND SEC., ET AL.

The petitions for rehearing are denied. Justice Kagan took

no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

D-2598 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF WAYNE R. BRYANT

Wayne R. Bryant, of Cherry Hill, New Jersey, is suspended

from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue,

returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he

should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2599 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF PAUL H. KING

Paul H. King, of La Union, Philippines, is suspended from

the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue,

returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why

he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this

Court.

D-2600 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF PHILIP M. KING

Philip M. King, of Mercer Island, Washington, is suspended

from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue,

returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he

should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2601 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF STEPHEN D. CRAMER

Stephen D. Cramer, of Federal Way, Washington, is suspended

from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue,

returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he

should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2602 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF PAUL C. DROZ

Paul C. Droz, of Mesquite, Nevada, is suspended from the

practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable

within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2603 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF MICHAEL R. LUONGO

Michael R. Luongo, of Margale City, New Jersey, is suspended

from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue,

returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he

should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2604 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF WILLIAM R. CHAMBERS

William R. Chambers, of Scottsdale, Arizona, is suspended

from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue,

returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he

should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

---