Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
URS ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR the USE AND BENEFIT OF the SECURED CREDITORS OF GROUND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES, INC., PNC Bank, N.A., Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, R.N. Robinson & Sons, Inc., Plaintiffs v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee v. Robert Kinghorn, Law Offices of Frederick Huff, Movants-Appellants
Robert Kinghorn and the Law Offices of Frederick Huff (“Mr. Kinghorn and Mr. Huff”) appeal the denial of their motion to intervene post-judgment at the Court of Federal Claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(3).
A motion to intervene must be timely. R. Ct. Fed. Cl. 24(a), (b). We review a trial court’s timeliness determination for abuse of discretion. See NAACP v. New York, 413 U.S. 345, 365–66, 93 S.Ct. 2591, 37 L.Ed.2d 648 (1973).
Mr. Kinghorn and Mr. Huff moved to intervene nearly one month after summary judgment was granted, and over one year after it was requested. J.A. 4. They sought to modify the judgment by over $4.5 million on a theory that had not been presented to the court by the plaintiffs in this case, a circumstance that these appellants were well aware of months before the grant of summary judgment. Id. Applying the relevant factors in its decision, the court denied the motion as untimely. J.A. 5–6.
We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the post-judgment motion to intervene was untimely. Because timeliness is dispositive, we affirm.
AFFIRMED
Prost, Chief Judge.
Was this helpful?
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)