Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Nanya Technology Corporation Delaware, Nanya Technology Corporation U.S.A., Appellants v. LONE STAR SILICON INNOVATIONS, LLC, Appellee
ORDER
Nanya Technology Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation Delaware, and Nanya Technology Corporation U.S.A. (collectively, “Nanya”) petitioned for inter partes review of claims 1, 2, 5-7, and 10 of U.S. Patent 6,388,330 (the “’330 patent”) owned by Lone Star Silicon Innovations, LLC. After that review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) held that claims 1, 5-6, and 10 are unpatentable but that Nanya failed to meet its burden to show that claims 2 and 7 are unpatentable. Nanya Tech. Corp. v. Lone Star Silicon Innovations, LLC, No. IPR2018-00062, 2019 WL 1373693 (PTAB March 25, 2019). Nanya appeals the Board’s decision with respect to claims 2 and 7.
In a separate appeal, we recently affirmed a decision of the Board holding claims 2 and 7 of the same ’330 patent unpatentable. Lone Star Silicon Innovations, LLC v. Iancu, No. 19-1669, ––– Fed.Appx. ––––, 2020 WL 1487265 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 25, 2020).
It Is Ordered That:
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as moot in light of our affirmance in Lone Star Silicon Innovations, LLC v. Iancu, No. 19-1669, ––– Fed.Appx. ––––, 2020 WL 1487265 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 25, 2020), which invalidated all of the claims at issue in this appeal.
Each party shall bear its own costs.
Per Curiam.
Was this helpful?
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)