Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HERMAN SYLVESTER WILLIAMS
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Last night at 7:59 PM, the case against the Defendant was dismissed upon request by the Government, and the Court ordered that the Defendant be released. Since then, the Court has been informed that a warrant on a Superior Court supervised release violation, predicated on the now-dismissed case, continues to hold the Defendant in custody. No later than noon today, either the relevant authorities should withdraw that hold based on the underlying case having been dismissed, or else appear at noon in-person in Courtroom 4 to explain why the hold has not been removed and the Defendant has not been released.
“In our society, liberty is the norm, and detention prior to trial or without trial is the carefully limited exception.” U.S. v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). Salerno dictates the limited nature of detention of those charged with a crime, but who are presumed innocent. The instant facts are more egregious: Mr. Williams is not just presumed innocent—his case has been outright dismissed. Mr. Williams’ continued detention is constitutionally infirm and anathema to a free society and fundamental fairness. The release of individuals must be met with commensurate, if not greater urgency than that which goes into arresting individuals in the middle of the night. It has now been over fifteen hours since this Court's order of release based on dismissal of the case, and yet, he remains incarcerated. There is no remedy this Court can fashion for this injustice, and the Court will not tolerate further delay.
HON. ZIA M. FARUQUI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 25-mj-00033 (MAU)
Decided: April 09, 2025
Court: United States District Court, District of Columbia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)