Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ronnie L. Harris, Appellant v. United States of America, Appellee
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motions to proceed without a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in Nos. 16-5049, et al., including a request for appointment of counsel; the motion to dismiss the appeals for lack of a COA, and the opposition thereto; the motion for summary reversal and to proceed without a COA in No. 16-5050; the notices filed by appellant; the motion for change of address filed November 7, 2016; the motion for injunction; the motion for temporary restraining order; the motion for “judg[ ]ment on the pleading”; and the motion for other relief filed January 3, 2017, it is
ORDERED that the request for appointment of counsel be denied. The interests of justice do not warrant the appointment of counsel in this case. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal and to proceed without a COA be denied, and the motion to dismiss granted. Because appellant has not “made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), no COA is warranted. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining motions, including those seeking injunctive relief to transfer appellant to the District of Columbia, be denied. Appellant has not shown a basis for this court to grant the relief requested.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. Because no certificate of appealability has been allowed, no mandate will issue.
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY:
Robert J. Cavello
Deputy Clerk
Per Curiam
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-5049
Decided: February 06, 2017
Court: United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)