Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Yolany PADILLA; Ibis Guzman; Blanca Orantes; Baltazar Vasquez, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; U.S. Department of Homeland Security; U.S. Customs and Border Protection; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director of ICE; Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of DHS; Chris Magnus, Commissioner of CBP; Ur M. Jaddou, Director of USCIS; Marc J. Moore, Seattle Field Office Director, ICE; Executive Office for Immigration Review; Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, United States Attorney General; Lowell Clark, Warden of the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, Washington; Charles Ingram, Warden of the Federal Detention Center in SeaTac, Washington; David Shinn, Director; James Janecka, Warden of the Adelanto Detention Facility, Defendants-Appellants, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, FKA Department of Social Services; Office of Refugee Resettlement; Xavier Becerra, Secretary of HHS; Scott Lloyd, Director of ORR; Chris Magnus, Commissioner of CBP; Elizabeth Godfrey, Acting Director of Seattle Field Office, ICE, Defendants.
ORDER
The Supreme Court has vacated the judgment of this Court, 953 F.3d 1134, and remanded this case to us for further consideration in light of Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1959, 207 L.Ed.2d 427 (2020), see Immigr. & Customs Enf't v. Padilla, ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 1041, 1041–42, 208 L.Ed.2d 513 (2021).
Therefore, we remand this case to the district court with instructions to vacate the preliminary injunction and for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decisions in Biden v. Texas, ––– U.S. ––––, 142 S. Ct. 2528, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2022), Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez, ––– U.S. ––––, 142 S. Ct. 2057, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2022), and Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1959, 207 L.Ed.2d 427 (2020). This order shall constitute the mandate of the Court.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-35565
Decided: July 29, 2022
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)