Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Bobby Darrell COLBERT, Applicant, v. Ron HAYNES, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM **
Bobby Colbert applies for leave to file a second or successive federal habeas petition challenging his 2005 state conviction and sentence for rape. See Colbert v. Haynes, 954 F.3d 1232, 1234–35 (9th Cir. 2020). Colbert acknowledges that he cannot meet the standard for a second or successive petition, but argues that his petition is not actually a second or successive petition because a 2017 order that changed his community custody (the “2017 Order”) effected a new judgment. The 2017 Order changed his community custody on one count from a variable term to a fixed term, in compliance with a 2009 statutory amendment that prohibited variable terms. This reduced Colbert's community custody on that count to a fixed term of 36 months instead of the prior variable range of 36 to 48 months. We deny the application.
A petition is not second or successive if it is the first petition to challenge a “new judgment.” Id. at 1235 (citation omitted). “Critical to this analysis is whether the [change in sentence] ‘replaces an invalid sentence with a valid one.’ ” Id. at 1236 (citation omitted). “In Washington, only sentencing errors stemming from a trial court exceeding its statutory authority render a sentencing judgment invalid.” Id. Because a variable custody term was lawful when the state court imposed it in 2005—four years before Washington's statutory amendment requiring fixed terms—the 2005 judgment remains valid, and the 2017 Order did not create a new judgment.
Further, even if there were an error, “sentencing errors correctible through ministerial action ․ are not errors that render the original sentence invalid.” Id. “[R]eset[ting] the end date for community custody [is] a purely ministerial function,” as evidenced by the Washington legislature's delegation to the Department of Corrections of the power to modify community custody terms in accordance with the 2009 statutory amendment. State v. Franklin, 172 Wash. 2d 831, 843, 263 P.3d 585 (2011) (en banc).
For these reasons, the 2017 Order did not create a new judgment, and Colbert's petition is therefore second or successive. Accordingly, Colbert must satisfy the requirements for filing a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2), which he concedes that he does not do. Thus, Colbert's application to file his petition is DENIED.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-73839
Decided: August 11, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)