Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brett VANBENSCHOTEN, Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM **
Appellant Brett VanBenschoten appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. We deny VanBenschoten's emergency motions for relief.
“[W]e review § 3582(c)(1) sentence reduction decisions for abuse of discretion.” United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021) (per curiam)). “A district court may abuse its discretion if it does not apply the correct law or if it rests its decision on a clearly erroneous finding of material fact.” Id. (quoting Aruda, 993 F.3d at 799).
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying VanBenschoten's motion after considering the statutory sentencing factors. The compassionate release statute directs courts to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). The district court here properly considered those factors and concluded that, on balance, they weighed against release. VanBenschoten had received a below-Guidelines sentence of 96 months, and at the time the district court ruled on his motion, he had served only twenty percent of it—roughly 18 months. Moreover, his crimes were serious: he was found in possession of a significant amount of methamphetamine as well as other drugs. Thus, the district court applied the correct law and its decision did not rest on a clearly erroneous finding of material fact.
AFFIRMED.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-50269
Decided: August 06, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)