Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Wayne ATTAWAY II, Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM ***
Joseph Wayne Attaway, II (“Appellant”) was convicted by a jury on three counts related to conspiracy to distribute and distribution of methamphetamines, under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(viii), 846, and was sentenced to 204 months in federal prison. Appellant challenges his conviction and claims he was denied a fair trial in violation of his due process rights based on improperly admitted evidence in two forms: witness testimony regarding law enforcement officials’ experience in gang-related assignments, and testimony describing the arrests of Appellant's alleged associates after a high-speed car chase.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review evidentiary decisions for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Alvirez, 831 F.3d 1115, 1120 (9th Cir. 2016). We review for plain error, however, when an objection is not raised before the district court. FED. R. CRIM. P. 52(b); United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731–36, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). We affirm because the district court did not commit plain error or abuse its discretion.
The district court properly admitted the testimony of law enforcement officials regarding their gang-related assignments as relevant to their background and qualifications. See United States v. Santiago, 46 F.3d 885, 889–90 (9th Cir. 1995) (holding there was no reversible error because the record does not indicate that evidence was introduced “to condemn [Appellant] merely for affiliation with a ․ gang”). The district court also properly admitted testimony about the arrests of Appellant's associates because the testimony made it more likely that Appellant's visits to their homes were in furtherance of his drug-trafficking scheme, and helped to explain why Appellant later sought a new drug supplier. Thus, the district court made no “clear or obvious” legal error. Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009) (citing Olano, 507 U.S. at 734, 113 S.Ct. 1770).
Furthermore, even assuming the challenged testimony was improperly admitted, there is overwhelming evidence of Appellant's guilt on the record, including wiretapped conversations in which Appellant discusses a drug sale and his efforts to find an alternative drug supplier. Thus, there is no “reasonable probability” that admitting the testimony in question “affected the outcome of the trial[,]” and so the district court did not commit plain error. United States v. Marcus, 560 U.S. 258, 262, 130 S.Ct. 2159, 176 L.Ed.2d 1012 (2010).
Further, the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting photos identifying Appellant's associates because the photos were relevant to confirming who was arrested after the car chase and to connecting these individuals to the addresses Appellant visited after each drug sale. See Sprint/United Mgmt. Co. v. Mendelsohn, 552 U.S. 379, 384, 128 S.Ct. 1140, 170 L.Ed.2d 1 (2008); United States v. Abel, 469 U.S. 45, 54, 105 S.Ct. 465, 83 L.Ed.2d 450 (1984). Given the evidence of Appellant's guilt on the record, even if the photos were improperly admitted, this “nonconstitutional error” did not “more likely than not affect[ ] the verdict.” United States v. Edwards, 235 F.3d 1173, 1178–79 (9th Cir. 2000).
AFFIRMED.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-10070
Decided: May 17, 2021
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)