Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Cesar Jacobo LUNA-FLORES; Jose Antonio Jacobo Luna-Lopez; Maria Del Carmen Flores-Castillo; Melva Eliu Bravo-Morales; et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Immigration and Customs Enforcement; U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Executive Office for Immigration Review; Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Secretary of DHS; L. Francis Cissna, in his official capacity as Director of CIS; Tony H. Pham, in his official capacity as Acting Director of ICE; Rodney Scott, in his official capacity as Chief Border Patrol Agent for CBP; William P. Barr, Attorney General; James McHenry, his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), Respondents-Appellees.
MEMORANDUM **
Cesar Jacobo Luna-Flores and ten family members appeal from the district court's judgment dismissing their 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We review de novo, Zavala v. Ives, 785 F.3d 367, 370 (9th Cir. 2015), and we affirm.
The district court did not err in determining that petitioners’ habeas corpus petition was moot, where petitioners were no longer in custody and conceded they were seeking an advisory opinion. See Abdala v. INS, 488 F.3d 1061, 1063-64 (9th Cir. 2007) (a habeas petition becomes moot if there is no longer a case or controversy following petitioner's release from custody). The record does not support petitioners’ contention that collateral consequences create a live controversy. See id. at 1064 (“[W]here the grounds for habeas relief will not redress collateral consequences, a habeas petition does not continue to present a live controversy once the petitioner is released from custody.”).
AFFIRMED.
Response sent, thank you
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-56020
Decided: December 08, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)