Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. T-SHACK, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Blackhorse Homeowners Association, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM **
T-Shack, Inc. appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Bank of New York Mellon (BNYM), finding that BNYM's predecessor preserved its deed of trust by tendering the superpriority amount prior to the Blackhorse Homeowners Association's (HOA) foreclosure sale of a residential property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we review the summary judgment order de novo, Badgley v. United States, 957 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2020), and we affirm.
BNYM sufficiently established that before the foreclosure sale, it tendered a $1,654.30 check to the HOA's foreclosure agent, Nevada Association Services, Inc., which covered nine months of unpaid HOA assessments and reasonable collection costs.1 T-Shack neither contested nor responded to this evidence below, and we decline to consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Ramirez v. Cnty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008–09 (9th Cir. 2015). And notably, the HOA conceded below that the tender satisfied the superpriority amount. By operation of law, therefore, the tender extinguished the HOA's superpriority lien, and the property remains subject to BNYM's deed of trust. See Bank of Am., N.A. v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 134 Nev. 604, 427 P.3d 113, 121 (2018) (en banc), as amended on denial of reh'g (Nov. 13, 2018). T-Shack purchased the property subject to BNYM's interest.
T-Shack's bona fide purchaser argument has been rejected by the Nevada Supreme Court. Id. BNYM was entitled to insist on the condition imposed in its tender, see Bank of Am., N.A. v. Arlington W. Twilight Homeowners Ass'n, 920 F.3d 620, 623 (9th Cir. 2019) (“Bank of America was entitled to insist on the condition ․ that acceptance would satisfy the HOA's superpriority lien.”), even if T-Shack had not forfeited its argument to the contrary by failing to raise it below. See Ramirez, 806 F.3d at 1008–09.
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1. The tender was effectuated by counsel for BNYM's predecessor in the deed of trust, Bank of America.
Response sent, thank you
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20-15228
Decided: November 24, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)