Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Steven Harry LUCORE, Sr.; Judy Lynne Lucore, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR the HOLDERS OF NEW CENTURY HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005-A, ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES; et al., Defendants-Appellees, First Legal Investigations; R.T. Hansell, Defendants.
MEMORANDUM **
Steven Harry Lucore, Sr. and Judy Lynne Lucore appeal pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing their action alleging federal and state law claims arising from appellees Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Bank of America, N.A.’s counterclaim against the Lucores filed in another lawsuit. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Kwan v. SanMedica Int'l, 854 F.3d 1088, 1093 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the Lucores’ malicious prosecution claim because the Lucores failed to allege facts sufficient to show the counterclaim was brought against them without probable cause. See Parrish v. Latham & Watkins, 3 Cal.5th 767, 221 Cal.Rptr.3d 432, 400 P.3d 1, 7 (2017) (elements of a malicious prosecution claim); Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarche, 31 Cal.4th 728, 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 636, 74 P.3d 737, 742 (2003) (probable cause for bringing a claim exists “if, at the time the claim was filed, any reasonable attorney would have thought the claim is tenable” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
Appellees’ motion to strike Mr. Lucore's declaration (Docket Entry No. 10) is granted because the declaration was not presented to the district court. See Barcamerica Int'l USA Trust v. Tyfield Importers, Inc., 289 F.3d 589, 595 (9th Cir. 2002) (granting motion to strike documents, including deposition transcript, that were not part of the record before the district court).
Appellees’ motion to strike the opening brief filed by Mrs. Lucore and to dismiss her appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Docket Entry No. 12) is denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(2) (“A pro se notice of appeal is considered filed on behalf of the signer and the signer's spouse ․ (if they are parties), unless the notice clearly indicates otherwise.”).
All other requests are denied.
AFFIRMED.
Response sent, thank you
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-55365
Decided: November 18, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)