Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kelly D. PORCH; Michelle R. Porch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PREFERRED CONTRACTORS INSURANCE COMPANY, RRG; Golden State Claims Adjusters, Inc.; Safebuilt Insurance Services, Inc., dba SIS Wholesale Insurance Services, Defendants-Appellees.
MEMORANDUM **
Kelly and Michelle Porch (the Porches) appeal the district court order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees.1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, we affirm. See Vazquez v. Cty. of Kern, 949 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2020).
The district court did not err in holding that no duty to defend existed as a matter of law. State substantive law governs the construction of an insurance policy. See Hawthorne Sav. F.S.B. v. Reliance Ins. Co. of Ill., 421 F.3d 835, 841 (9th Cir. 2005). “[W]hen the language of a policy is clear and explicit, the policy should be enforced as written․” Steadele v. Colony Ins. Co., 361 Mont. 459, 260 P.3d 145, 149 (2011) (citation omitted).
The insurance policy at issue in this case included a Fall from Heights exclusion that unequivocally excluded the Porches’ claim. The provision excluded from coverage any bodily injury “arising out of, resulting from, caused by, contributed to by, or in any way related to, in whole or in part, from ․ a fall from ․ ladders, ․ where there is a height differential to the ground.” Because it was undisputed that Mr. Porch fell from a ladder where a height differential to the ground existed, the exclusion applied. See Steadele, 260 P.3d at 149.2 Finally, any claim of ambiguity failed, because the Porches did not proffer an alternative reasonable interpretation of the provision. See id.
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1. Appellees are Preferred Contractors Insurance Company, Golden State Claims Adjusters, Inc., and Safebuilt Insurance Services, Inc. dba SIS Wholesale Insurance Services.
2. The Porches’ attempt to distinguish between falling from the ladder and falling with the ladder is unavailing in view of the broad language of the Fall from Heights exclusion (“arising out of, resulting from, caused by, contributed to by, or in any way related to, in whole or in part”). See Wendell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 293 Mont. 140, 974 P.2d 623, 639 (1999) (construing similar insurance contract language to be read broadly).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-35770
Decided: September 03, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)