GADDY v. TOWNSEND (2020)

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Michael John Gaddy appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Gaddy failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants took any adverse action against him because of a grievance he filed to correct an erroneous disciplinary record, which was in fact corrected. See Rhodes v. Robinson, 408 F.3d 559, 567-68 (9th Cir. 2005) (setting forth elements of a First Amendment retaliation claim in the prison context).

AFFIRMED.